Beijing Court Orders Hospital to Resume Embryo Transfer for Widow
Beijing Court Orders Hospital to Resume Embryo Transfer for Widow
A Beijing court ordered a hospital to resume treatment for a widow seeking to use two embryos created with her husband before his death, finding that her request breached no law, agreement, or ethical principle.
A Beijing court has ordered a hospital to resume embryo-transfer treatment for a widow who wants to use two frozen embryos created with her husband before his death.
The Chaoyang District People’s Court disclosed the case on Sept. 22 while publishing its annual white paper on medical disputes. It ruled for the woman, surnamed Zhang, and said she would bear the treatment costs. The judges found that her request violated neither the law nor the couple’s agreement and did not conflict with ethical principles.
Zhang married her husband, surnamed Li, in 2016. After Zhang experienced repeated miscarriages and Li was diagnosed with secondary infertility, they sought treatment at a Beijing hospital’s reproductive center. Three embryos were frozen in 2019.
Li died from a brainstem hemorrhage in July 2019. Zhang subsequently used one embryo and gave birth to a daughter. Two embryos remained in storage.
When Zhang later asked to use the remaining embryos, the hospital refused. It said consent could not be obtained from Li, raised concerns about a possible inheritance dispute, cited a contract clause permitting destruction of the embryos if either spouse died, and noted that its ethics committee had not approved the procedure.
Zhang told the court that she was prepared to assume the legal, ethical, and moral responsibilities associated with the transfer and any resulting birth. Her mother-in-law supported the request. Zhang then sued the hospital.
Chinese rules on human assisted reproductive technology, issued in the early 2000s, generally limit access to married couples and exclude single women. The hospital argued that Zhang no longer met the marital requirement after Li’s death. Zhang maintained that the embryos were created while they were married and that she should be allowed to use them.
The court found no outstanding inheritance conflict because Li’s estate had already been settled through notarization and a settlement agreement. It also found that Zhang and Li had formed a clear and shared intention to have children before his death.
The judges distinguished Zhang’s circumstances from those of an unmarried woman seeking assisted reproductive treatment. The embryos had been created during her marriage, and the hospital had already carried out one successful transfer for her. It therefore could not subsequently rely on restrictions concerning single women to deny access to the remaining embryos, the court said.
The ruling identified Zhang as an independent rights holder under the embryo-transfer service contract and directed the hospital to continue treatment at her expense. The court said disputes arising from assisted reproductive technology require consideration of legal restrictions, ethical issues, family consensus, and contractual obligations.
The case was included in the court’s medical-disputes white paper as an example of emerging legal questions created by advances in assisted reproductive technology.
曾-M.Zēng--THT-士蔑報
